Search Results
| Case name | Citation | Summary |
| [Arizona] STATE OF ARIZONA v DANIEL DIAZ | 2010/04/19 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CR-09-0257-PR Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; Margaret H Downie, Concur |
| [Arizona] MONICA LIPS/WALTER LIPS v SCOTTSDALE HEALTHCARE | 2010/05/03 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-09-0273-PR Michael D. Ryan, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
| [Arizona] JOSE CARRILLO v HON. HOUSER/PHX CITY PROSECUTOR | 2010/06/07 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-09-0285-PR Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Author; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
| [Arizona] STATE OF ARIZONA v CHRISTOPHER ALLEN HARGRAVE | 2010/06/14 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CR-06-0061-AP Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, ConcurConstitutionality DecisionHolding A.R.S. § 13-751(F)(6) ("especially heinous" aggravating factor) vague but constitutional because of a clarifying jury instruction and not violative of Ariz. Const. art. 2 § 4 (due process clause), U.S. Const. amends. 5, 14 (due process clause), U.S. Const. amend. 8 (punishment not applied arbitrarily). Holding A.R.S. § 13-757(A) (death penalty by lethal injection) constitutional and not violative of Ariz. Const. art. 2 § 15 (cruel and unusual punishment), U.S. Const. amend. 8 (cruel and unusual punishment). |
| [Arizona] STATE OF ARIZONA v AARON BRIAN GUNCHES | 2010/06/16 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CR-08-0038-AP W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
| [Arizona] STATE OF ARIZONA v SHAWN PATRICK LYNCH | 2010/06/22 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CR-06-0220-AP Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, ConcurConstitutionality DecisionHolding A.R.S. § 13-752(K) (providing for the impaneling of a new jury if the former jury cannot reach a verdict during the first penalty phase) constitutional under Ariz. Const. art. 2 § 10 (double jeopardy clause), U.S. Const. amend. 5 (double jeopardy clause). |
| [Arizona] STATE OF ARIZONA v JOSHUA IDLEFONSO VILLALOBOS | 2010/07/01 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CR-08-0098-AP Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, ConcurConstitutionality DecisionHolding A.R.S. § 13-751(F)(6) ("especially heinous" aggravating factor) constitutional under Ariz. Const. art. 2 § 4 (due process clause) and U.S. Const. amends. 5, 14 (due process clause). |
| [Arizona] KADLEC/HOWELL v DORSEY | 2010/07/02 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-10-0028-PR Michael D. Ryan, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
| [Arizona] STATE OF ARIZONA v ADAM SCOTT KING | 2010/07/07 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CR-09-0333-PR Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
| [Arizona] KRISTEN JOHNSON et al v ADOT | 2010/07/08 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-09-0267-PR A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur |
| [Arizona] STATE OF ARIZONA v BRIAN ALLEN WOMBLE | 2010/07/12 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CR-07-0139 Michael D. Ryan, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, ConcurConstitutionality DecisionHolding A.R.S. § 13-751(F)(6) (cruelty aggravator) constitutional based on jury instruction under U.S. Const. amends. 5, 14 (due process) and U.S. Const. amend. 8 (punishment not applied arbitrarily). |
| [Arizona] CARDONA et al v HON. KREAMER/LAC VIEUX et al | 2010/07/30 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-10-0017-PR W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
| [Arizona] PACION/BOWIE v BOB THOMAS et al/HUPPENTHAL et al | 2010/08/02 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-10-0179-AP/EL Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
| [Arizona] JAMES TARRON et ux v BOWEN MACHINE & FABRICATING | 2010/08/03 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-09-0230-PR Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
| [Arizona] STATE OF ARIZONA v DEREK DON CHAPPELL | 2010/08/03 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CR-07-0384-AP A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, ConcurConstitutionality DecisionHolding A.R.S. § 13-751(F)(6) (cruelty aggravator) constitutional because of a clarifying jury instruction and under U.S. Const. amends. 5, 14 (due process). |
| [Arizona] RICHARD/MARCIA GRAND v NACCHIO et al | 2010/08/05 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-09-0317-PR Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Peter B Swann, Concur |
| [Arizona] IN RE MH-2008-000867 | 2010/08/05 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-09-0297-PR Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
| [Arizona] MICHAEL McCLUNG v BENNETT/JOE SWEENEY et al | 2010/08/06 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-10-0183 Rebecca White Berch, Author; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
| [Arizona] STATE OF ARIZONA v GARY WAYNE SNELLING | 2010/08/09 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CR-08-0164-AP A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, ConcurConstitutionality DecisionHolding A.R.S. § 13-751(F)(6) (Cruelty aggravator) constitutional because of a clarifying jury instruction and under U.S. Const. amends 5, 14 (due process). |
| [Arizona] GARY GRIFFITH v BACA/DICKERSON/GRAHAM COUNTY et al | 2010/08/17 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-10-0197-AP/EL W. Scott Bales, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |