171.34—Standards of review.
        
        (a) Disciplinary actions.
         In reviewing a final decision of the National Futures Association in a disciplinary action, the Commission shall affirm the order of the National Futures Association, unless the Commission finds that:
    
    
    
        
        (2) 
         The proceedings were not conducted in a manner consistent with the rules of the National Futures Association;
    
    
        
        (3) 
         The weight of the evidence does not support the findings of the National Futures Association concerning  the relevant acts or practices engaged in or omitted;
    
    
        
        (4) 
         The determination that the acts or practices engaged in or omitted violated rules of the National Futures Association does not rest on a reasonable interpretation of the rules at issue;
    
    
        
        (5) 
         The National Futures Association's application of its rules is not consistent with the purposes of the Act;
    
    
        
        (6) 
         The National Futures Association's choice of sanction is excessive or oppressive in light of the violations found having due regard for the public interest.
    
    
        
        (b) Membership denial actions.
         In reviewing a final decision of the National Futures Association in a membership denial action, the Commission shall affirm the order of the National Futures Association, unless the Commission finds that:
    
    
    
        
        (2) 
         The proceedings were not conducted in a manner consistent with the rules of the National Futures Association;
    
    
    
        
        (4) 
         The conclusion of the National Futures Association is not consistent with the purposes of the Act.
    
    
        
        (c) Registration actions.
         In reviewing a decision of the National Futures Association in a registration action, the Commission shall affirm the order of the National Futures Association unless the Commission finds that:
    
    
    
        
        (2) 
         The proceedings were not conducted in a manner consistent with the rules of the National Futures Association;
    
    
    
        
        (4) 
         The conclusion of the National Futures Association is not consistent with the purposes of the Act.