4.1111—Voluntary dismissal.

Whether the case is to be submitted without a hearing, or heard pursuant to §§ 4.118 through 4.123, the Board may upon its own initiative or upon the application of either party, call upon the parties to appear before a member or hearing officer of the Board for a conference to consider:
(a) The simplification or clarification of the issues;
(b) The possibility of obtaining stipulations, admissions, agreements on documents, understandings on matters already of record, or similar agreements which will avoid unnecessary proof;
(c) The limitation of the number of expert witnesses, or avoidance of similar cumulative evidence, if the case is to be heard;
(d) The possibility of agreement disposing of all or any of the issues in dispute; and
(e) Such other matters as may aid in the disposition of the appeal.
Any conference results that are not reflected in a transcript shall be reduced to writing by the Board member or the hearing officer. This writing shall thereafter constitute part of the record.
(a) Any person, including a State, or OSM may petition for leave to intervene at any stage of a proceeding in OHA under the act.
(b) A petitioner for leave to intervene shall incorporate in the petition a statement setting forth the interest of the petitioner and, where required, a showing of why his interest is or may be adversely affected.
(c) The administrative law judge or the Board shall grant intervention where the petitioner—
(1) Had a statutory right to initiate the proceeding in which he wishes to intervene; or
(2) Has an interest which is or may be adversely affected by the outcome of the proceeding.
(d) If neither paragraph (c)(1) nor (c)(2) of this section apply, the administrative law judge or the Board shall consider the following in determining whether intervention is appropriate—
(1) The nature of the issues;
(2) The adequacy of representation of petitioner's interest which is provided by the existing parties to the proceeding;
(3) The ability of the petitioner to present relevant evidence and argument; and
(4) The effect of intervention on the agency's implementation of its statutory mandate.
(e) Any person, including a State, or OSM granted leave to intervene in a proceeding may participate in such proceeding as a full party or, if desired, in a capacity less than that of a full party. If an intervenor wishes to participate in a limited capacity, the extent and the terms of the participation shall be in the discretion of the administrative law judge or the Board.
Any party who initiated a proceeding before OHA may seek to withdraw by moving to dismiss at any stage of a proceeding and the administrative law judge or the Board may grant such a motion.
(a) Except for oral motions made in proceedings on the record, or where the administrative law judge otherwise directs, each motion shall—
(1) Be in writing; and
(2) Contain a concise statement of supporting grounds.
(b) Unless the administrative law judge or the Board orders otherwise, any party to a proceeding in which a motion is filed under paragraph (a) of this section shall have 15 days from service of the motion to file a statement in response.
(c) Failure to make a timely motion or to file a statement in response may be construed as a waiver of objection.
(d) An administrative law judge or the Board shall rule on all motions as expeditiously as possible.
When proceedings involving a common question of law or fact are pending before an administrative law judge or the Board, such proceedings are subject to consolidation pursuant to a motion by a party or at the initiative of an administrative law judge or the Board.
(a) Except in expedited review proceedings under § 4.1180, or in temporary relief proceedings under § 4.1266, at any time after commencement of a proceeding, any party may move to advance the scheduling of a proceeding.
(b) Except as otherwise directed by the administrative law judge or the Board, any party filing a motion under this section shall—
(1) Make the motion in writing;
(2) Describe the exigent circumstances justifying advancement;
(3) Describe the irreparable harm that would result if the motion is not granted; and
(4) Incorporate in the motion affidavits to support any representations of fact.
(c) Service of a motion under this section shall be accomplished by personal delivery or by telephonic or telegraphic communication followed by mail. Service is complete upon mailing.
(d) Unless otherwise directed by the administrative law judge or the Board, all parties to the proceeding in which the motion is filed shall have 10 days from the date of service of the motion to file a statement in response to the motion.
(e) Following the timely receipt by the administrative law judge of statements in response to the motion, the administrative law judge may schedule a hearing regarding the motion. If the motion is granted, the administrative law judge may advance pleading schedules, prehearing conferences, and the hearing, as deemed appropriate: Provided, A hearing on the merits shall not be scheduled with less than 5 working days notice to the parties, unless all parties consent to an earlier hearing.
(f) If the motion is granted, the Board may, if it deems such action to be appropriate, advance the appeal on its calendar and order such other advancement as may be appropriate, including an abbreviated schedule for briefing or oral argument.
Any person entitled to a hearing before an administrative law judge under the act may waive such right in writing. Where parties are directed by any rule in these regulations to file a responsive pleading on or before a specified time, any party who fails to file such responsive pleading by the time specified, may be deemed to have waived his right to a hearing. Unless all parties to a proceeding who are entitled to a hearing waive, or are deemed to have waived such right, a hearing will be held.
Except where temporary relief is granted pursuant to section 525(c) or section 526(c) of the act, notices of violation and orders of cessation issued under the act shall remain in effect during the pendency of review before an administrative law judge or the Board.