§ 5-2-206 - Ignorance or mistake.
               	 		
5-2-206.    Ignorance or mistake.
    (a)  It  is a defense to a prosecution that the actor engaged in the conduct  charged to constitute the offense under a mistaken belief of fact if:
      (1)  The  statute defining the offense or a statute relating to the offense  expressly provides that a mistaken belief of fact constitutes a defense;  or
      (2)  Mistaken belief of fact establishes a defense of justification provided by    5-2-601 et seq.
(b)  Except  as provided by subsection (c) of this section, a person is not relieved  of criminal liability for conduct because he or she engages in that  conduct believing that the conduct does not as a matter of law  constitute an offense.
(c)  It is an  affirmative defense to a prosecution that the actor engaged in the  conduct charged to constitute the offense believing that the conduct did  not as a matter of law constitute an offense, if the actor acted in  reasonable reliance upon an official statement of the law contained in:
      (1)  A statute or other enactment afterward determined to be invalid or erroneous;
      (2)  The latest judicial decision of the highest state or federal court that has decided the matter; or
      (3)  An  official interpretation of a public servant or agency charged by law  with responsibility for the interpretation or administration of the law  defining the offense.
(d)    (1)  Although  ignorance or mistake of fact would otherwise afford a defense to the  offense charged, the defense is not available if the defendant would be  guilty of another offense had the situation been as he or she supposed.
      (2)  However,  in a case described by subdivision (d)(1) of this section the ignorance  or mistake of fact of the defendant reduces the class or degree of the  offense of which he or she may be convicted to that of the offense of  which the defendant would be guilty had the situation been as he or she  supposed.
(e)  A mistake of law other  than as to the existence or meaning of the statute under which the  defendant is prosecuted is relevant to disprove the specific culpable  mental state required by the statute under which the defendant is  prosecuted.