Sec. 38a-226b. Violations. Notice and hearing. Penalties. Appeal.

      Sec. 38a-226b. Violations. Notice and hearing. Penalties. Appeal. (1) Whenever the commissioner has reason to believe that a utilization review company subject to sections 38a-226 to 38a-226d, inclusive, has been or is engaging in conduct in violation of said sections, and that a proceeding by the commissioner would be in the interest of the public, the commissioner shall issue and serve upon such company a statement of the charges in that respect and a notice of a hearing to be held at a time and place fixed in the notice, which shall not be less than thirty days after the date of service. At the time and place fixed for such hearing, such company shall have an opportunity to be heard and to show cause why an order should not be made by the commissioner requiring such company to cease and desist from the alleged conduct complained of.

      (2) If, after such hearing, the commissioner determines that the utilization review company charged has engaged in a violation of sections 38a-226 to 38a-226d, inclusive, the commissioner shall reduce the findings to writing and shall issue and cause to be served upon the utilization review company a copy of such findings and an order requiring such company to cease and desist from engaging in such violation. The commissioner may order any of the following:

      (A) Payment of a civil penalty of not more than one thousand five hundred dollars for each act or violation, provided such penalty shall not exceed an aggregate penalty of fifteen thousand dollars unless the company knew or reasonably should have known it was in violation of sections 38a-226 to 38a-226d, inclusive, in which case the penalty shall be not more than seven thousand five hundred dollars for each act or violation not to exceed an aggregate penalty of seventy-five thousand dollars in any six-month period;

      (B) Suspension or revocation of the utilization review company's license to do business in this state if it knew or reasonably should have known that it was in violation of sections 38a-226 to 38a-226d, inclusive; or

      (C) Payment of such reasonable expenses as may be necessary to compensate the commissioner in connection with the proceedings under this subdivision, which shall be dedicated exclusively to the regulation of utilization review.

      (3) Any company aggrieved by any such order of the commissioner may appeal therefrom in accordance with the provisions of section 4-183, except venue for such appeal shall be in the judicial district of New Britain.

      (4) Any person who violates a cease and desist order of the commissioner made pursuant to this section and while such order is in effect shall, after notice and hearing and upon order of the commissioner, be subject to the following: (A) A civil penalty of not more than seventy-five thousand dollars; or (B) suspension or revocation of such person's license.

      (P.A. 88-230, S. 1, 12; P.A. 90-98, S. 1, 2; P.A. 91-305, S. 3; P.A. 93-142, S. 4, 7, 8; P.A. 95-220, S. 4-6; P.A. 97-99, S. 17; P.A. 99-215, S. 24, 29; P.A. 08-178, S. 8.)

      History: (Revisor's note: P.A. 88-230 and P.A. 90-98 authorized substitution of "judicial district of Hartford" for "judicial district of Hartford-New Britain" in public and special acts of the 1991 session of the general assembly, effective September 1, 1993); P.A. 93-142 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1993, to September 1, 1996, effective June 14, 1993; P.A. 95-220 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1996, to September 1, 1998, effective July 1, 1995; P.A. 97-99 changed "Insurance Department" to "commissioner" in Subsec. (2)(C); P.A. 99-215 replaced "judicial district of Hartford" with "judicial district of New Britain" in Subsec. (3), effective June 29, 1999; P.A. 08-178 made technical changes, amended Subsec. (2)(A) by increasing maximum penalty from $1,000 to $1,500 per violation and aggregate maximum penalty from $10,000 to $15,000, and for violations of which the company knew or reasonably should have known, increasing maximum penalty from $5,000 to $7,500 per violation and aggregate maximum penalty in any 6-month period from $50,000 to $75,000, and amended Subsec. (4)(A) by increasing maximum penalty from $50,000 to $75,000.