§ 21-2-5 - Qualifications of candidates for federal and state office; determination of qualifications
               	 		
O.C.G.A.    21-2-5   (2010)
   21-2-5.    Qualifications of candidates for federal and state office; determination of qualifications 
      (a)  Every  candidate for federal and state office who is certified by the state  executive committee of a political party or who files a notice of  candidacy shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for  holding the office being sought.
(b)  The  Secretary of State upon his or her own motion may challenge the  qualifications of any candidate at any time prior to the election of  such candidate. Within two weeks after the deadline for qualifying, any  elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate may challenge the  qualifications of the candidate by filing a written complaint with the  Secretary of State giving the reasons why the elector believes the  candidate is not qualified to seek and hold the public office for which  he or she is offering. Upon his or her own motion or upon a challenge  being filed, the Secretary of State shall notify the candidate in  writing that his or her qualifications are being challenged and the  reasons therefor and shall advise the candidate that he or she is  requesting a hearing on the matter before an administrative law judge of  the Office of State Administrative Hearings pursuant to Article 2 of  Chapter 13 of Title 50 and shall inform the candidate of the date, time,  and place of the hearing when such information becomes available. The  administrative law judge shall report his or her findings to the  Secretary of State.
(c)  The Secretary of  State shall determine if the candidate is qualified to seek and hold the  public office for which such candidate is offering. If the Secretary of  State determines that the candidate is not qualified, the Secretary of  State shall withhold the name of the candidate from the ballot or strike  such candidate's name from the ballot if the ballots have been printed.  If there is insufficient time to strike the candidate's name or reprint  the ballots, a prominent notice shall be placed at each affected  polling place advising voters of the disqualification of the candidate  and all votes cast for such candidate shall be void and shall not be  counted.
(d)  In the event that a candidate  pays his or her qualifying fee with a check that is subsequently  returned for insufficient funds, the Secretary of State shall  automatically find that such candidate has not met the qualifications  for holding the office being sought, unless the bank, credit union, or  other financial institution returning the check certifies in writing by  an officer's or director's oath that the bank, credit union, or  financial institution erred in returning the check.
(e)  The  elector filing the challenge or the candidate challenged shall have the  right to appeal the decision of the Secretary of State by filing a  petition in the Superior Court of Fulton County within ten days after  the entry of the final decision by the Secretary of State. The filing of  the petition shall not itself stay the decision of the Secretary of  State; however, the reviewing court may order a stay upon appropriate  terms for good cause shown. As soon as possible after service of the  petition, the Secretary of State shall transmit the original or a  certified copy of the entire record of the proceedings under review to  the reviewing court. The review shall be conducted by the court without a  jury and shall be confined to the record. The court shall not  substitute its judgment for that of the Secretary of State as to the  weight of the evidence on questions of fact. The court may affirm the  decision or remand the case for further proceedings. The court may  reverse or modify the decision if substantial rights of the appellant  have been prejudiced because the findings, inferences, conclusions, or  decisions of the Secretary of State are:
      (1)  In violation of the Constitution or laws of this state;
      (2)  In excess of the statutory authority of the Secretary of State;
      (3)  Made upon unlawful procedures;
      (4)  Affected by other error of law;
      (5)  Clearly erroneous in view of the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence on the whole record; or
      (6)  Arbitrary or capricious or characterized by an abuse of discretion or a clearly unwarranted exercise of discretion.
An  aggrieved party may obtain a review of any final judgment of the  superior court by the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court, as provided  by law.