9:17-50 - Witnesses;  compelling to testify;  immunity;  contempt; physician's testimony;  admissibility of evidence

9:17-50.  Witnesses;  compelling to testify;  immunity;  contempt; physician's testimony;  admissibility of evidence
    a.  The mother of the child and the alleged father are competent to testify  and may be compelled to testify.

    b.  Upon refusal of any witness, including a party, to testify under oath or  produce evidence, the court may order the witness to testify under oath and  produce evidence concerning all relevant facts.  If the refusal is upon the  ground that the testimony or evidence might tend to incriminate the witness,  the court, after notice to the prosecutor, may grant the witness immunity from  all criminal liability on account of the testimony or evidence that the witness  is required to produce.  An order granting immunity bars prosecution of the  witness for any offense shown in whole or in part by testimony or evidence the  witness is required to produce, except for perjury committed in the testimony.   The refusal of a witness who has been granted immunity to obey an order to  testify or produce evidence is a civil contempt of the court.

    c.  Testimony of a physician concerning the medical circumstances of the pregnancy, and the condition and characteristics of the child upon birth is not  privileged.

    d.  Testimony relating to sexual access to the mother by any man at any time  other than the probable time of conception of the child is inadmissible in  evidence, unless offered by the mother.  Before testimony relating to sexual  access to the mother by an unidentified man at the probable time of conception  may be introduced, the court shall hold an in camera hearing to determine  whether the evidence is sufficiently probative so that the interests of justice  require its admission.

    e.  In an action against an alleged father, uncorroborated evidence offered  by him with respect to a man who is not subject to the jurisdiction of the  court concerning his sexual intercourse with the mother at or about the  probable time of conception of the child is admissible in evidence only if the  other man has undergone blood tests or genetic tests, the results of which do  not exclude the possibility of his paternity of the child and which tests are  made available to the court.  A man who is identified and is subject to the  jurisdiction of the court shall be made a party in the action.

     L.1983, c. 17, s. 13.