7102 - Comparative negligence.

     § 7102.  Comparative negligence.        (a)  General rule.--In all actions brought to recover damages     for negligence resulting in death or injury to person or     property, the fact that the plaintiff may have been guilty of     contributory negligence shall not bar a recovery by the     plaintiff or his legal representative where such negligence was     not greater than the causal negligence of the defendant or     defendants against whom recovery is sought, but any damages     sustained by the plaintiff shall be diminished in proportion to     the amount of negligence attributed to the plaintiff.        (b)  Recovery against joint defendant; contribution.--Where     recovery is allowed against more than one defendant, each     defendant shall be liable for that proportion of the total     dollar amount awarded as damages in the ratio of the amount of     his causal negligence to the amount of causal negligence     attributed to all defendants against whom recovery is allowed.     The plaintiff may recover the full amount of the allowed     recovery from any defendant against whom the plaintiff is not     barred from recovery. Any defendant who is so compelled to pay     more than his percentage share may seek contribution.        (b.1)  Recovery against joint defendant; contribution.--     (Unconstitutional).        (b.2)  Apportionment of responsibility among certain     nonparties and effect.--(Unconstitutional).        (b.3)  Off-road vehicle riding.--            (1)  Off-road vehicle riding area operators shall have no        duty to protect riders from common, frequent, expected and        nonnegligent risks inherent to the activity, including        collisions with riders or objects.            (2)  The doctrine of knowing voluntary assumption of risk        shall apply to all actions to recover damages for negligence        resulting in death or injury to person or property brought        against any off-road vehicle riding area operator.            (3)  Nothing in this subsection shall be construed in any        way to abolish or modify a cause of action against a        potentially responsible party other than an off-road vehicle        riding area operator.        (c)  Downhill skiing.--            (1)  The General Assembly finds that the sport of        downhill skiing is practiced by a large number of citizens of        this Commonwealth and also attracts to this Commonwealth        large numbers of nonresidents significantly contributing to        the economy of this Commonwealth. It is recognized that as in        some other sports, there are inherent risks in the sport of        downhill skiing.            (2)  The doctrine of voluntary assumption of risk as it        applies to downhill skiing injuries and damages is not        modified by subsections (a) and (b).        (c.1)  Savings provisions.--(Unconstitutional).        (d)  Definitions.--As used in this section the following     words and phrases shall have the meanings given to them in this     subsection:        "Defendant or defendants."  Includes impleaded defendants.        "Off-road vehicle."  A motorized vehicle that is used off-     road for sport or recreation. The term includes snowmobiles,     all-terrain vehicles, motorcycles and four-wheel drive vehicles.        "Off-road vehicle riding area."  Any area or facility     providing recreational activities for off-road vehicles.        "Off-road vehicle riding area operator."  A person or     organization owning or having operational responsibility for any     off-road vehicle riding area. The term includes:            (1)  Agencies and political subdivisions of this        Commonwealth.            (2)  Authorities created by political subdivisions.            (3)  Private companies.        "Plaintiff."  Includes counter claimants and cross-claimants.     (Apr. 28, 1978, P.L.202, No.53, eff. 60 days; Oct. 5, 1980,     P.L.693, No.142, eff. 60 days; Dec. 20, 1982, P.L.1409, No.326,     eff. 60 days; June 19, 2002, P.L.394, No.57, eff. 60 days; July     15, 2004, P.L.736, No.87, eff. imd.)        2007 Effectuation of Declaration of Unconstitutionality.  The     Legislative Reference Bureau effectuated the 2005     unconstitutionality.        2005 Unconstitutionality.  Act 57 of 2002 was declared     unconstitutional. Deweese v. Weaver, 880 A.2d 54 (Pa.     Commonwealth 2005).        2004 Amendment.  Act 87 amended subsec. (d) and added subsec.     (b.3).        2002 Amendment.  Section 6 of Act 57 provided that the     amendment of section 7102 shall apply to all causes of action     that accrue after the effective date of section 6.