Search Results
| Case name | Citation | Summary |
| A. & G. Stevedores v. Ellerman Lines | 1962/02/20 | Docket No: none |
| A Quantity Of Books v. Kansas | 1964/04/01 | Docket No: none |
| A & P Tea Co. v. Cottrell | 1975/12/01 | Docket No: none |
| 44 Liquormart Inc. v. Rhode Island | 1995/11/01 | Docket No: none |
| 324 Liquor Corp. v. Duffy | 1986/11/03 | Docket No: none |
| 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett | 2008/12/01 | Docket No: none |
| Astrue v. Capato | 2012/03/19 | Docket No: none |
| Armour v. City of Indianapolis | 2012/02/29 | Docket No: none |
| Sackett v. EPA | 2012/03/21 | Docket No: none |
| Missouri v. Frye | 2012/03/21 | Docket No: none |
| Lafler v. Cooper | 2012/03/21 | Docket No: none |
| Golan v. Holder | 2011/03/07 | TBD |
| Bullcoming v. New Mexico | 2011/06/23 | A defendant's Confrontation Clause rights cover a non-testifying laboratory analyst whose supervisor testifies as to test results that the analyst transcribed from a machine. |
| Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association | 2011/06/27 | The Constitution prevents the state of California from banning the sale of violent video games to minors. |
| Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting | 2011/05/26 | An Arizona law that sanctions employers who hire illegal immigrants is not preempted by federal immigration law. |
| Arizona Christian School Tuition Org. v. Winn | 2011/04/04 | Taxpayers lack standing to challenge a tax credit program that provides dollar-for-dollar incentives to donations to school tuition groups, including those awarding tuition scholarships only to religious schools. |
| Connick v. Thompson | 2011/03/29 | A prosecutor's office cannot be held liable for a single Brady violation by one of its members on the theory that the office provided inadequate training. |
| Brown v. Plata | 2011/05/23 | A three-judge panel of the District Court properly ordered the California prison system to release prisoners to resolve overcrowding. |
| Swarthout v. Cooke | 2011/01/24 | State prisoners have no Constitutional right to parole |
| Premo, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary v. Moore | 2011/01/19 | Habeas relief may not be granted with respect to any claim a state-court has found on the merits unless the state-court decision denying relief involves an "unreasonable application" of "clearly established federal law, as determined by" the Court. |