| Case name |
Citation |
Summary |
| Saudi Arabia v. Nelson |
1993 |
jurisdiction in an action based upon a "commercial activity" under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act |
| Reno v. Flores |
1993 |
procedures for detaining juvenile aliens awaiting deportation |
| Shaw v. Reno |
1993 |
appropriateness of considering race in redistricting |
| Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan |
1993 |
quantum of proof required for a claim of attempted monopolization under § 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act |
| Herrera v. Collins |
1993 |
claim of actual innocence is not grounds for federal habeas corpus relief |
| Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic |
1993 |
Civil Rights Act of 1871 could not be used to halt blockades of abortion clinics |
| Nixon v. United States |
1993 |
judicial impeachment, political question doctrine |
| Commissioner v. Soliman |
1993 |
"principal place of business" under the Internal Revenue Code |
| Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council |
1992 |
per se rule of takings clause |
| United States v. Fordice |
1992 |
segregation of colleges and universities |
| Planned Parenthood v. Casey |
1992 |
abortion; reaffirming the "core holding" of Roe v. Wade |
| Lee v. Weisman |
1992 |
First Amendment, establishment of religion (prayer at high school graduations) |
| R. A. V. v. City of St. Paul |
1992 |
fighting words, hate speech |
| Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. William Wrigley, Jr., Co. |
1992 |
permissible scope of taxation of out-of-state corporations doing business within a particular state. |
| New York v. United States |
1992 |
the take title provision of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 violated the 10th Amendment |
| Forsyth County, Georgia v. The Nationalist Movement |
1992 |
1st Amendment protection and police protection |
| Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Association |
1992 |
federal preemption of state labor safety laws |
| Georgia v. McCollum |
1992 |
standard on peremptory challenges from Batson v. Kentucky applied to criminal defendant |
| Morgan v. Illinois |
1992 |
A defendant facing the death penalty may challenge for cause a prospective juror who would automatically vote to impose the death penalty in every case |
| United States v. Alvarez-Machain |
1992 |
application of the Ker-Frisbie doctrine |