Abuelhawa v. United States

Case Date: 03/04/2009
Court: United States Court of Appeals
Docket No: none

Facts of the Case 

In 2007, a federal district court convicted Salman Khade Abuelhawa in part for unlawfully, knowingly, and intentionally using a communications facility (a telephone) in committing, causing, and facilitating a felony (distribution of cocaine) in violation of 21 U.S.C. Section 843(b). Mr. Abuelhawa appealed arguing that Section 843(b) does not apply because he purchased cocaine for personal use, which is not a felony.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed Mr. Abuelhawa’s conviction. It reasoned that Mr. Abuelhawa's use of a cell phone facilitated cocaine distribution because his telephone call made the distribution of cocaine "easier" for his dealer, which is a felony, thus Section 843(b) properly applies.

Question 

Does the use of a telephone to buy cocaine for personal use "facilitate" the commission of a felony (the seller's distribution of cocaine) and violate 21 U.S.C. Section 843(b)?

Argument Abuelhawa v. United States - Oral ArgumentFull Transcript Text  Download MP3Abuelhawa v. United States - Opinion Announcement  Download MP3 Conclusion  Decision: 9 votes for Abuelhawa, 0 vote(s) against Legal provision: Controlled Substances Act

No. With Justice David H. Souter writing for a unanimous Supreme Court, it held that using a telephone to make a misdemeanor drug purchase does not "facilitate" felony drug distribution. The Court concentrated on the "plain meaning" of the statute in order to reach its conclusion.