Burson v. Freeman
Case Date: 10/08/1991
Docket No: none
|
Freeman, a Tennessee political campaign treasurer, challenged the constitutionality of the Tennessee Code forbidding the solicitation of votes and the display or distribution of campaign materials within 100 feet of entrances to polling facilities. On appeal from a lower court's dismissal, the Tennessee Supreme Court reversed, finding that the 100-foot ban was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court granted Burson certiorari. QuestionDid Tennessee's 100-foot limit violate the First Amendment's freedom of speech? Argument Burson v. Freeman - Oral ArgumentFull Transcript Text Download MP3Burson v. Freeman - Opinion AnnouncementFull Transcript Text Download MP3 Conclusion Decision: 5 votes for Burson, 3 vote(s) against Legal provision: Amendment 1: Speech, Press, and AssemblyNo. After subjecting Tennessee's statute to exacting scrutiny, since it constituted a facial content-based restriction on political speech in a public forum, the Court held that the statute was narrowly drafted to serve a compelling state interest. By creating a safe zone around polling sites, the statute served the state's interest in protecting its citizen's right to vote freely and effectively. Moreover, the 100-foot zone was acceptable since it was not so large as to completely block out the presence of political messages. |