Campos-Orrego v. Rivera

Case Date: 05/10/1999
Court: United States Court of Appeals
Docket No: 98-1318

United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit





No. 98-1318

NORA CAMPOS-ORREGO,

Plaintiff, Appellee,

v.

ALBA RIVERA, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellants.



APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Carmen Consuelo Cerezo, U.S. District Judge]



Before

Selya, Circuit Judge,

Coffin and Cyr, Senior Circuit Judges.




Sylvia Roger Stefani, Assistant Solicitor General, Puerto Rico
Dep't of Justice, with whom Carlos Lugo Fiol, Solicitor General,
and Edda Serrano Blasini, Deputy Solicitor General, were on brief,
for appellants.
Judith Berkan, with whom Mary Jo Mendez-Vilella was on brief,
for appellee.





May 4, 1999




SELYA, Circuit Judge. This appeal requires us, inter
alia, to address an important question as to the circumstances in
which an award of punitive damages for a constitutional tort may
endure without a corresponding award of compensatory damages.
The underlying litigation had its genesis in the
employment of plaintiff-appellee Nora Campos-Orrego (Campos) with
the Puerto Rico Comision para los Asuntos de la Mujer (Women's
Rights Commission or Commission). Campos claims that defendants-
appellants Alba Rivera, Olga Birriel Cardona, and Enid Gavilan
Perez, her superiors at the Commission, retaliated against her for
attempting to assist a victim of sexual harassment. A jury
determined that Campos's claim had merit and awarded her damages.
The appellants solicit our intervention, but their lackadaisical
approach to appellate advocacy proves once again that "courts
like the Deity are more prone to help those who help themselves."
Williams v. Drake, 146 F.3d 44, 50 (1st Cir. 1998). The short of
it is that the appellants have squandered most of their assigned
errors through defaults of various kinds. Hence, we limit our
substantive review to the few remaining grounds (one of which
involves the punitive damages issue mentioned above).
In the ordinary case, we would begin by limning the
relevant factual background. Here, however, for reasons that will
soon become apparent, we submit only a thumbnail sketch, drawn
primarily from Campos's complaint.
Campos worked for the Women's Rights Commission for
several years, principally as a staff attorney. In that capacity,
she often counseled victims of gender-based discrimination. One
such individual, whom we shall call Client A, met with Campos in
1991 and related a tale of sexual harassment at the hands of the
Mayor of Bayamon, a high-level figure in the New Progressive Party
(the political party to which the appellants all belong). Campos
counseled Client A and explained her legal options, but Client A
chose not to pursue her rights at that time.
In August 1994, after a brief interval during which she
worked elsewhere, Campos was rehired by the Women's Rights
Commission as a quondam consultant under a one-year contract. In
this post, she not only functioned as a staff attorney, but also
analyzed sexual harassment in Puerto Rico's public institutions.
In November of 1994, Client A returned to the Commission's offices
and requested a copy of her file. Campos supplied it. Client A
proceeded to lodge a sexual harassment complaint against the Mayor
on or about June 1, 1995.
The media pounced on Client A's story like a pride of
hungry lions on a side of beef. Extensive coverage began as early
as June 2. The three appellants summoned Campos to a meeting that
very day and interrogated her as to why she had given Client A a
copy of the file. According to Campos, the appellants intimated
that the matter should have been treated with greater discretion
because it involved the Mayor. On June 3, two of the appellants
discussed the incident on a popular radio show and implied that an
unnamed employee (who could not have been anyone but Campos) was
incompetent, or insubordinate, or both. By letter dated June 6,
Rivera (the Commission's executive director) terminated Campos's
employment effective June 30 and did so notwithstanding that,
roughly a week before the story broke, Campos had accepted Rivera's
offer to renew her contract for another year, commencing July 1,
1995. The next day, El D