FCC v. League of Women Voters of California
Case Date: 01/16/1984
Docket No: none
|
The Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 allocated federal funds to noncommercial television and radio stations to support operations and educational programming. The act did not allow stations receiving money under the act to "engage in editorializing." QuestionDid the ban on editorializing violate the First Amendment? Argument FCC v. League of Women Voters of California - Oral ArgumentFull Transcript Text Download MP3 Conclusion Decision: 5 votes for League of Women Voters of California, 4 vote(s) against Legal provision: 47 U.S.C. 399Yes. Even though the Commerce Clause gives Congress the power to regulate the broadcast medium, "since broadcasters are engaged in a vital and independent form of communicative activity," Congress must use the First Amendment to "inform and give shape" to its regulation. Justice Brennan argued that no legitimate government interest was served by the law which broadly banned all editorializing, a form of speech which "lies at the heart of First Amendment protection." |