Grutter v. Bollinger
Case Date: 07/10/2025
|
Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court upheld the affirmative action admissions policy of the University of Michigan Law School. Justice O'Connor, writing for the majority in a 5-4 decision, ruled that the University of Michigan Law School had a compelling interest in promoting class diversity and that its "plus" system did not amount to a quota system that would have been unconstitutional under Regents of the University of California v. Bakke.
Justice Ginsburg, joined by Justice Breyer, concurred in judgment, but stated that they did not ascribe to the Court's belief that the affirmative measures at hand would be unnecessary in 25 years.
Chief Justice Rehnquist, joined by Justice Kennedy, Justice Scalia, and Justice Thomas, dissented, arguing that the University's "plus" system was, in fact, a thinly veiled and unconstitutional quota system. Chief Justice Rehnquist cited the fact that the percentage of African American applicants closely mirrored the percentage of African American applicants that were accepted.
Justice Kennedy also dissented separately, arguing that the Court failed to apply, in fact, strict scrutiny as required by Justice Powell's opinion in Bakke. Both Justice Scalia and Justice Thomas also dissented separately.
|