Honda v. Oberg
Case Date: 04/20/1994
Docket No: none
|
Karl Oberg was driving an all-terrain vehicle when it overturned, causing him severe, permanent injuries. The jury in his trial assessed almost $1 million in compensatory damages, and an additional $5 million in punitive damages. A 1910 amendment to the Oregon state constitution prohibited judicial review of jury awards. QuestionDoes the Oregon prohibition on judicial review of jury awards violate the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment? Argument Honda v. Oberg - Oral ArgumentFull Transcript Text Download MP3Honda v. Oberg - Opinion AnnouncementFull Transcript Text Download MP3 Conclusion Decision: 7 votes for Honda, 2 vote(s) against Legal provision: Due ProcessYes. The denial of judicial review creates the possibility that juries might make arbitrary and excessive awards without offering a way to adjust them. The common-law practice of allowing judicial review for jury awards is important in ensuring that juries do not ignore guidelines. |