Kastigar v. United States
Case Date: 01/11/1972
Docket No: none
|
Kastigar cited his Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination in refusing to testify before a grand jury, even though prosecutors had granted him immunity from the use of his testimony in subsequent criminal proceedings. He was found in contempt of court for failing to testify. QuestionCan the government, by granting immunity from the use of compelled testimony in future prosecutions, force a witness who invokes the Fifth Amendment to testify? Argument Kastigar v. United States - Oral ArgumentFull Transcript Text Download MP3 Conclusion Decision: 5 votes for United States, 2 vote(s) against Legal provision: Self-IncriminationThe Court found that compelled testimony is legitimate given the grant of immunity. Justice Powell found that the protections of immunity that a congressional statute provided were "coextensive with the scope of the privilege against self-incrimination" and "sufficient to compel testimony over a claim of the privilege." |