NAACP v. Button
Case Date: 11/08/1961
Docket No: none
|
The NAACP was prosecuted for violating a Virginia statute which banned "the improper solicitation of any legal or professional business." QuestionDid the law, as applied to the NAACP's activities, violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments? Argument NAACP v. Button - Oral ArgumentFull Transcript Text Download MP3NAACP v. Button - Oral ReargumentFull Transcript Text Download MP3 Conclusion Decision: 6 votes for NAACP, 3 vote(s) against Legal provision: Amendment 1: Speech, Press, and AssemblyYes. In a 6-3 decision, the Court held that the activities of the NAACP amounted to "modes of expression and association protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments which Virginia may not prohibit." NAACP-initiated litigation was "a form of political expression" and not "a technique of resolving private differences," argued Justice William J. Brennan, Jr., who authored the majority opinion. Justice John Marshall Harlan dissented, joined by Justices Potter Stewart and Tom Clark. |