Nebraska Press Assoc. v. Stuart
Case Date: 04/19/1976
Docket No: none
|
A Nebraska state trial judge, presiding over a widely publicized murder trial, entered an order restraining members of the press from publishing or broadcasting accounts of confessions made by the accused to the police. The judge felt that this measure was necessary to guarantee a fair trial to the accused. QuestionDid the judge's order violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments? Argument Nebraska Press Assoc. v. Stuart - Oral ArgumentFull Transcript Text Download MP3Nebraska Press Assoc. v. Stuart - Opinion Announcement Download MP3 Conclusion Decision: 9 votes for Nebraska Press Assoc., 0 vote(s) against Legal provision: Amendment 1: Speech, Press, and AssemblyYes. The Court agreed with the trial judge that the murder case would generate "intense and pervasive pretrial publicity." However, the unanimous court held that the practical problems associated with implementing a prior restraint on the press in this case would not have served the accused's rights. Chief Justice Burger reasoned that"a whole community cannot be restrained from discussing a subject intimately affecting life within it." |