State v. Enno
Case Date: 06/26/2007
Docket No: 20060273
|
State v. EnnoNo. 20060273 Per Curiam. [¶1] Steven Enno appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of violating a disorderly conduct restraining order. Enno argues there was insufficient evidence to support the jury verdict; however, two eyewitnesses testified Enno was within 100 yards of the victim's residence, which was prohibited by the disorderly conduct restraining order. Concluding there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's guilty verdict, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). [¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. |