State v. Holy Bear

Case Date: 04/22/1997
Docket No: 960219

State v. Holy BearCriminal No. 960219

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Lyle Frank Holy Bear was convicted by a jury for gross sexual imposition. He appealed, claiming the evidence was insufficient to sustain a verdict of guilty, and that the trial court erred in admitting hearsay testimony under N.D.R.Ev. 803 (24). We conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the hearsay testimony, and the verdict was based on sufficient evidence. The judgment of conviction is affirmed under Rule 35.1(a)(3) and (4), N.D.R.App.P.[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Herbert L. Meschke
Dale V. Sandstrom
William A. Neumann