State v. Rath
Case Date: 06/16/1993
Docket No: 930053
|
State v. Rath Criminal No. 930053 Per Curiam. Roddy Rath appealed from a district court order revoking probation and from the amended judgment of conviction for the felony offense of theft of property. The finding of probation violations was not clearly erroneous; and the revocation of probation, and the amendment of judgment were not an abuse of discretion. See Rule 32(f)(2)(iii), N.D.R.Crim.P.; State v. Orseth, 359 N.W.2d 852 (N.D. 1984). The order and amended judgment are affirmed under Rule 35.1(a)(2) and (4), N.D.R.App.P. Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
|