State v. Ruud
Case Date: 05/11/2006
Docket No: 20050314
|
State v. RuudNo. 20050314 Per Curiam. [¶1] Thomas Ruud appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after the district court found him guilty of theft of property under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-23-02. Ruud argues there was insufficient evidence to sustain a conviction and the district court erred in admitting and considering hearsay testimony. [¶2] We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). [¶3]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. |