State v. Szklarski

Case Date: 11/09/2010
Docket No: 20100087

State v. SzklarskiNo. 20100087

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Daniel Szklarski appeals from the trial court's judgment and order revoking his probation. On appeal, Szklarski argues the trial court erred in allowing him to represent himself at the probation revocation hearing because he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to counsel. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner