O'Connor v. Ortega
Case Date: 10/15/1986
Docket No: none
|
In 1981, officials at a hospital, including Executive Director Dr. Dennis O'Connor, suspected improprieties in Dr. Ortega's management of a residency program. The officials conducted an investigation of Ortega, which included multiple searches of his office and seizure of a number of items. The items were later used in proceedings before the California State Personnel Board to impeach the credibility of witnesses that testified on Dr. Ortega's behalf. QuestionDid the supervisor's search of the office violate Dr. Ortega's "reasonable expectation of privacy" guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment? Argument O'Connor v. Ortega - Oral ArgumentFull Transcript Text Download MP3O'Connor v. Ortega - Opinion AnnouncementFull Transcript Text Download MP3 Conclusion Decision: 5 votes for O'Connor, 4 vote(s) against Legal provision: Amendment 4: Fourth AmendmentIn a 5-to-4 decision, the Court held that the search did not violate the Fourth Amendment. The Court held that "the realities of the workplace" made some expectations of privacy among public employees unreasonable when the intrusion was by a supervisor rather than a law enforcement official. Work- related searches, the Court found, were "merely incident to the primary business of the agency," and a warrant requirement would "seriously disrupt the routine conduct of business." The Court thus held that a standard of "reasonableness" was sufficient for work-related intrusions by public employers. |