Rotary Int. v. Rotary Club

Case Date: 03/30/1987
Docket No: none

Facts of the Case 

When the Duarte chapter of Rotary International violated club policy by admitting three women into its active membership its charter was revoked and it was expelled. The California Court of Appeals, however, in reversing a lower court decision, found that Rotary International's action violated a California civil rights act prohibiting sexual discrimination.

Question 

Did a law which required California Rotary Clubs to admit women members violate Rotary International's First Amendment rights of association?

Argument Rotary Int. v. Rotary Club - Oral ArgumentFull Transcript Text  Download MP3 Conclusion  Decision: 7 votes for Rotary Club, 0 vote(s) against Legal provision: Association

No. Considering the size, purpose, selectivity, and exclusivity of Rotary's membership, the Court found that the relationship among the club's members was not of the intimate or private variety which warrants First Amendment protection. Writing for the unanimous Court, Justice Powell argued that because many of Rotary's activities (including their meetings) are conducted in the presence of strangers, and because women members would not prevent the club from carrying out its purposes, there was no violation of associational rights. Furthermore, even if there were a slight encroachment on the rights of Rotarians to associate, that minimal infringement would be justified since it "serves the State's compelling interest" in ending sexual discrimination.