United States v. Paradise
Case Date: 11/12/1986
Docket No: none
|
In response to a series of NAACP-initiated lawsuits in the 1970s, the Alabama Department of Public Safety was required to implement a promotion scheme in which half of the department's promotions to certain ranks would go to black officers if enough qualified blacks were available. QuestionDid the one-black-for-one-white promotion scheme violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? Argument United States v. Paradise - Oral ArgumentFull Transcript Text Download MP3United States v. Paradise - Opinion AnnouncementFull Transcript Text Download MP3 Conclusion Decision: 5 votes for Paradise, 4 vote(s) against Legal provision: Equal ProtectionIn a plurality opinion, the Court upheld the promotion plan. The scheme did not impose an "absolute bar" to white advancement, was narrowly drawn to include only specific ranks in the department, and, according to the four justices who voted to affirm it, was "required in light of the Department's long and shameful record of delay and resistance" in complying with past judicial decisions. It is important to remember that courts had first found the Department's practices unconstitutional in 1972. |