Find Court Cases > State Of Washington, Res. V. Christopher Charles Loy, App.

State Of Washington, Res. V. Christopher Charles Loy, App.

Case Date: 02/27/2012
Court: Court of Appeals Division I
Docket No: 66672-0

 
DO NOT CITE. SEE GR 14.1(a).


Court of Appeals Division I
State of Washington

Opinion Information Sheet

Docket Number: 66672-0
Title of Case: State Of Washington, Res. V. Christopher Charles Loy, App.
File Date: 02/27/2012

SOURCE OF APPEAL
----------------
Appeal from King County Superior Court
Docket No: 01-1-10952-5
Judgment or order under review
Date filed: 02/07/2011
Judge signing: Honorable J Wesley Saint Clair

JUDGES
------
Authored byRonald Cox
Concurring:Anne Ellington
Ann Schindler

COUNSEL OF RECORD
-----------------

Counsel for Appellant(s)
 Washington Appellate Project  
 Attorney at Law
 1511 Third Avenue
 Suite 701
 Seattle, WA, 98101

 Maureen Marie Cyr  
 Washington Appellate Project
 1511 3rd Ave Ste 701
 Seattle, WA, 98101-3635

Counsel for Respondent(s)
 Prosecuting Atty King County  
 King Co Pros/App Unit Supervisor
 W554 King County Courthouse
 516 Third Avenue
 Seattle, WA, 98104

 Amy R Meckling  
 King County Prosecutor's Office
 516 3rd Ave Ste W554
 Seattle, WA, 98104-2390
			

    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
                                     DIVISION ONE

STATE OF WASHINGTON,                        )       No. 66672-0-I
                                            )
                      Respondent,           )
                                            )
       v.                                   )
                                            )
CHRISTOPHER CHARLES LOY,                    )       UNPUBLISHED OPINION
                                            )
                      Appellant.            )       FILED:  February 27, 2012
                                            )

       PER CURIAM.  In this third appeal stemming from his 2003 conviction for first 

degree murder, Christopher Loy contends the court conducting his most recent 

resentencing erred in denying his CrR 7.8 motion.  The record, however, does not 

support Loy's claim that such a motion was made or ruled on below.

       There is no CrR 7.8 motion or supporting briefing in the record.  And while Loy 

did raise grounds for a new trial at the resentencing hearing, he also told the court that 

he had not obtained a necessary transcript and needed a continuance to "draw

something up for your Honor ."  Verbatim Report of Proceedings (Feb. 24, 2011) at 5, 

6.  The court treated Loy's argument as a motion for a continuance to file a motion for a 

new trial and supporting transcripts.  The court denied that motion, but noted that Loy 

could raise his arguments in a personal restraint petition. 

No. 66672-0-I/2

       Because Loy does not contest the court's ruling, we affirm. 

                                            FOR THE COURT:

                                               2