State Of Washington, Respondent V. Feisal Omar, Appellant

Case Date: 01/30/2012
Court: Court of Appeals Division I
Docket No: 67057-3

 
DO NOT CITE. SEE GR 14.1(a).


Court of Appeals Division I
State of Washington

Opinion Information Sheet

Docket Number: 67057-3
Title of Case: State Of Washington, Respondent V. Feisal Omar, Appellant
File Date: 01/30/2012

SOURCE OF APPEAL
----------------
Appeal from King County Superior Court
Docket No: 11-1-00294-9
Judgment or order under review
Date filed: 03/21/2011
Judge signing: Honorable Gregory P Canova

JUDGES
------
Authored byMarlin Appelwick
Concurring:Mary Kay Becker
J. Robert Leach

COUNSEL OF RECORD
-----------------

Counsel for Appellant(s)
 Jennifer J Sweigert  
 Nielsen Broman & Koch PLLC
 1908 E Madison St
 Seattle, WA, 98122-2842

Counsel for Respondent(s)
 Bridgette Eileen Maryman  
 King County Prosecutor's Office
 W554 King County Courthouse
 516 3rd Ave
 Seattle, WA, 98104-2385
			

     IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON,                        )
                                            )       No. 67057-3-I
                      Respondent,           )
                                            )       DIVISION ONE
               v.                           )
                                            )       UNPUBLISHED OPINION
FEISAL MOHAMED OMAR,                        )
                                            )
                      Appellant.            )
                                            )       FILED:  January 30, 2012

       Per Curiam.  Feisal Omar appeals from the 48-month term of probation imposed 

after he pleaded guilty to one count of fourth degree assault-domestic violence and one 

count of third degree theft-domestic violence.  He contends, and the State concedes, 

that the trial court lacked authority to impose any term of probation exceeding 24 

months.  We accept the State's concession.  See State v. Parent, ___ Wn. App. ___, 

___ P.3d ___, 2011 WL 4912853 (Wash. July 25, 2011) (probation limitation of RCW 

9.95.210 refers to the cumulative sentence).  Accordingly, we reverse and remand for 

imposition of a term of probation consistent with RCW 9.95.210 and State v. Parent.

       Reversed and remanded.

                      FOR THE COURT: 

No. 66356-9-I/2

                                              - 2 -