Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma

Case Date: 03/02/1955
Docket No: none

Facts of the Case 

An Oklahoma law prohibited persons who were not licensed optometrists or ophthalmologists to fit lenses for eyeglasses. Non-licensed individuals were also prohibited from duplicating optical instruments without written prescriptions from licensed ophthalmologists. The Lee Optical Company challenged the law, bringing a suit against the state Attorney General, Mac Q. Williamson.

Question 

Did the Oklahoma law violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

Conclusion  Decision: 8 votes for Williamson, 0 vote(s) against Legal provision: Equal Protection

In a unanimous decision, the Court held that while the law may have been "needless" and "wasteful," it was the duty of the legislature, not the courts, "to balance the advantages and disadvantages of the new requirement." The Court emphasized that "[t]he day is gone when this Court uses the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to strike down state laws, regulatory of business and industrial conditions, because they may be unwise, improvident, or out of harmony with a particular school of thought."