Wood v. Milyard
Case Date: 02/27/2012
Docket No: none
|
Patrick Wood filed pro se (on his own behalf) in federal court for a writ of habeas corpus claiming that his convictions for felony murder and second degree murder violated the Sixth Amendment privilege against double jeopardy and challenging the validity of his jury trial waiver. The District Court denied relief. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit appointed Wood with an attorney and directed the parties to address the timeliness of Wood's petition. The appeals court found that Wood's habeas petition was untimely and affirmed the decision of the District Court. Question1) Does an appellate court have the authority to raise the statute of limitations defense without a request by any party? 2) Does the state’s declaration before the district court that it "will not challenge, but [is] not conceding, the timeliness of Wood's habeas petition," amount to a deliberate waiver of any statute of limitations defense the state may have had? Argument Wood v. Milyard - Oral ArgumentFull Transcript Text Download MP3 |