1993 WY 159, 865 P.2d 616, Wood v. Wood

Case Date: 12/17/1993
Court: Supreme Court of Wyoming
Docket No: 93-67

Wood v. Wood
1993 WY 159
865 P.2d 616
Case Number: 93-67
Decided: 12/17/1993
Supreme Court of Wyoming


Cite as: 1993 WY 159, 865 P.2d 616


Margaret Mary WOOD,

Appellant (Plaintiff),

v.

Ernest Lee WOOD,

Appellee (Defendant).

Appeal from the District Court, Natrona County, Harry E. Leimback, J.

Patrick M. Hunter, Casper, for appellant.

Lawrence E. Middaugh, Casper, for appellee.

Before MACY, C.J., and THOMAS, CARDINE, GOLDEN and TAYLOR, JJ.

TAYLOR, Justice.

[1]      This appeal, from an unreported hearing, follows a decision adverse to appellant in a dispute over allegedly delinquent child support payments. We dismiss because of the failure to settle the record on appeal as required by the Wyoming Rules of Appellate Procedure.

[2]      Appellant, Margaret Mary Wood (Margaret), filed a petition on October 1, 1992 seeking to hold her former husband, appellee, Ernest Lee Wood (Ernest), in contempt of court for allegedly being delinquent in the payment of $7,400.00 for child support. The district court conducted a hearing and found that Margaret had failed to prove her allegations by a preponderance of the evidence. The hearing was unreported.

[3]      Margaret brought this appeal claiming error in the allocation of the burden of proof at the hearing. In an attempt to create a record on appeal, Margaret filed a "Statement of Evidence and Proceedings" under W.R.A.P. 3.03. The statement included an account of testimony at the hearing and documents, some of which had apparently been received into evidence. Ernest filed a number of proposed amendments to the statement of evidence.

[4]      The record on appeal is fundamental to the exercise of appellate review because this court does not act as a fact finder. Gifford v. Casper Neon Sign Co., Inc., 618 P.2d 547, 551 (Wyo. 1980). See W.R.A.P. 3.01 (defining contents of record on appeal). When a proceeding is reported and transcribed, the appellant may assert error in the findings or conclusions of the district court. W.R.A.P. 3.02. The Wyoming Rules of Appellate Procedure specify a means of providing a record on appeal to support claims of error when a proceeding is unreported:

     If no report of the evidence or proceedings at a hearing or trial was made, or if a transcript is unavailable, appellant may prepare a statement of the evidence or proceedings from the best available means including appellant's recollection. The statement shall be served on appellee, who may serve objections or propose amendments within 15 days after service. The statement and any objections or proposed amendments shall be submitted to the trial court for settlement and approval and as settled and approved shall be included by the clerk of the trial court in the record on appeal.

W.R.A.P. 3.03 (emphasis added).

[5]      Appellant bears the burden to bring a sufficient record to this court upon which a decision can be based. Scherling v. Kilgore, 599 P.2d 1352, 1357 (Wyo. 1979). Appellant has failed in this instance to follow the dictates of our procedure. The statement of evidence and the proposed amendments offered by the parties were not settled and approved and included in the record on appeal. W.R.A.P. 3.03.

[6]      Without a settled record of the proceedings at the hearing, we are unable to consider this appeal and order it dismissed. Korkow v. Markle, 746 P.2d 434, 435 (Wyo. 1987); Sharp v. Sharp, 671 P.2d 317, 318 (Wyo. 1983); Matter of Parental Right of SCN, 659 P.2d 568, 572 (Wyo. 1983).

[7]      Dismissed.

MACY, Chief Justice, dissenting.

[8]      I dissent. Although the record on appeal is not a model of completeness, it is, together with that part of the record which is settled, adequate to reveal that the appellee was ordered to pay child support to the appellant through the Clerk of the District Court in Natrona County, Casper, Wyoming, and that the appellee made no payments in that manner. That is sufficient to carry the burden of proof for the appellant to show nonpayment. It was then incumbent upon the appellee to present documentary proof of payment of all the support ordered by the court.

[9]      I would reverse and remand with directions that judgment be entered in favor of the appellant for all the child support she claims is unpaid, less credit to the appellee for only those amounts for which he can produce documentary proof of payment. Wyo. Stat. 20-2-113(g) (Supp. 1993) dictates that child support payments be made to the appellant through the clerk of the district court, and that requirement cannot be dispensed with by a mere agreement of the parties. The purpose of this statutory provision is to avoid the costly and time-consuming court action and appeal which have taken place in this instance.

 

Citationizer Summary of Documents Citing This Document


Cite Name Level
Wyoming Supreme Court Cases
 CiteNameLevel
 1996 WY 97, 919 P.2d 138, Munoz v. MunozCited
 1996 WY 95, 920 P.2d 662, Stadtfeld v. StadtfeldCited
 1999 WY 91, 983 P.2d 717, Thomas v. ThomasCited
 2002 WY 127, 53 P.3d 101, BURT v. BURTCited
 2003 WY 87, 72 P.3d 1158, SMITH v. SMITHCited
 2003 WY 129, 77 P.3d 1219, IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GEORGECited
 2003 WY 161, 81 P.3d 184, YATES v. YATESCited
 2004 WY 77, 92 P.3d 825, VERNIER v. VERNIERCited
 2005 WY 44, 109 P.3d 544, ANNE V. CARROLL V. WILLIAM JOHN LAWCited
 2005 WY 45, 109 P.3d 548, RANDY EUGENE BEEMAN V. MELLISSA LEANN BEEMANCited
 2005 WY 99, 117 P.3d 1244, JERAL DEE HARSHBERGER V. CHARLES A. HARSHBERGERCited
 2006 WY 68, 134 P.3d 1262, TW v. BMCited
 2006 WY 111, 141 P.3d 705, DENISE SEHERR-THOSS V. ROGER SEHERR-THOSSCited
 2010 WY 158, 245 P.3d 269, PETER V. STEIGER and SYLVIA STEIGER v. HAPPY VALLEY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONCited
Citationizer: Table of Authority
Cite Name Level
Wyoming Supreme Court Cases
 CiteNameLevel
 1979 WY 114, 599 P.2d 1352, Scherling v. KilgoreCited
 1980 WY 88, 618 P.2d 547, Gifford v. Casper Neon Sign Co., Inc.Cited
 1983 WY 111, 671 P.2d 317, Sharp v. SharpCited
 1987 WY 166, 746 P.2d 434, Korkow v. MarkleCited