1995 WY 204, 908 P.2d 414, MN v. CS

Case Date: 12/15/1995
Court: Supreme Court of Wyoming
Docket No: C-95-2

MN v. CS
1995 WY 204
908 P.2d 414
Case Number: C-95-2
Decided: 12/15/1995
Supreme Court of Wyoming


Cite as: 1995 WY 204, 908 P.2d 414


MN, Appellant(Petitioner), v.  CS and PTS, Appellees (Respondents). Appeal from the District Court, Sweetwater County, Jere Ryckman, J.    Richard Beckwith of Greenhalgh and Beckwith, P.C., Rock Springs, for Appellant.   No appearance for appellees.   Before GOLDEN, C.J., and THOMAS, MACY, TAYLOR and LEHMAN, JJ.   TAYLOR, Justice. [1]         The issue in this case is whether a default judgment, entered on the heels of improper service of
 process, can be enforced.  Defective service of process renders any subsequent judgment a nullity. The
 district court's denial of the Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment is reversed and the matter is remanded
 to the district court for further proceedings.
 I. ISSUES [2]         Appellant raises the following questions on appeal:   I. Were there defects in the service of process?     A. Did the Third Judicial District Court have the personal jurisdiction necessary to enter a judgment    against the Appellant?   II. Does Rule 12 of the Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure contemplate post-judgment motions?     A. Did the Appellant waive his right to object to a void judgment when he failed to raise the issue in    his first post-judgment Motion to Set Aside Default?     B. Can Appellant's failure to allege defects in the service of process in his original post-judgment    Motion to Set Aside Default resurrect a void judgment?   Appellees did not file an appellate brief. II. FACTS [3] CS filed suit against MN seeking to establish that MN was the father of her child, PTS. The complaint was
 not served upon MN personally. Rather, upon the advice of counsel, the complaint was left with MN's
employer at MN's place of employment on October 17, 1989. MN did not respond to the complaint in a
 timely fashion. On February 28, 1990, the district court entered an Order, Judgment and Decree of Paternity.
MN filed a Petition to Determine Non-Existence of Paternity and a Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment.
CS then filed a Motion to Dismiss. The district court dismissed the Petition to Determine Non-Existence
 of Paternity; denied the Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment; and granted CS's Motion to Dismiss on
January 23, 1995. MN now appeals.
 III. DISCUSSION [4]  This case turns on the fact that CS never properly served MN with the complaint. W.R.C.P. 4(d)
 provides, in pertinent part:
     (d) Personal service. * * * Service shall be made as follows:       (1) Upon an individual other than a person under 14 years of age or an incompetent person, by    delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the individual personally, or by    leaving copies thereof * * * at the defendant's usual place of business with an employee of the    defendant then in charge of such place of business[.]   It is clear that the rule does not authorize service of process on a defendant's employer. The record, however,
 reveals that CS served process on MN's employer at MN's place of business. This is not an authorized
 method of serving process and is, therefore, defective.
 [5]         We have held, repeatedly, that service of process must strictly comply with the requirements set forth
 in W.R.C.P. 4. See In Interest of DG, 825 P.2d 369, 374-77 (Wyo. 1992); Bryant v. Wybro Federal Credit
Union, 544 P.2d 1010, 1012 (Wyo. 1976); and Oedekoven v. Oedekoven, 475 P.2d 307, 308 (Wyo. 1970).
When service of process is lacking or is otherwise defective, the district court lacks jurisdiction to enter a
judgment or order. In Interest of DG, 825 P.2d at 376-77 (quoting Goss v. Goss, 780 P.2d 306, 312
(Wyo. 1989)). Therefore, the order establishing MN's paternity was void ab initio and is of no force or effect.
 In Interest of DG, 825 P.2d at 376-77 (quoting Goss, 780 P.2d at 312).
 IV. CONCLUSION [6]  The decision of the district court to deny MN's Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment is reversed.
This matter is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
 

 

Citationizer Summary of Documents Citing This Document


Cite Name Level
Wyoming Supreme Court Cases
 CiteNameLevel
 1996 WY 93, 920 P.2d 647, Glandt v. TaylorCited
 1999 WY 91, 983 P.2d 717, Thomas v. ThomasCited
 1999 WY 19, 974 P.2d 931, CRB v. State, Dept. of Family ServicesCited
 1998 WY 108, 960 P.2d 1023, French v. Amax Coal WestCited
Citationizer: Table of Authority
Cite Name Level
Wyoming Supreme Court Cases
 CiteNameLevel
 1970 WY 52, 475 P.2d 307, Oedekoven v. OedekovenCited
 1976 WY 6, 544 P.2d 1010, Bryant v. Wybro Federal Credit UnionCited
 1989 WY 172, 780 P.2d 306, MARTIN J. GOSS v. PAMELA J. GOSSCited
 1992 WY 11, 825 P.2d 369, In Interest of DGCited